Carole.T Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:15 pm
Module 12 - Tim the Dalmation
Luckily it was top of the pile in my box of answers, so easily found!
One thing that annoyed me about the Case Histories when I did it, was that none of the dogs had a 'vet check' immediately prior to the consultation - So, basically I found that I had to make up the outcome of a vet visit where applicable. Not ideal as if you are not experienced on the clinical side of things, or of what a vet may check for, you may easily go down the wrong 'diagnosis' track? Although the cases do ask for alternative Case Scenario summary, so at least that provides 'non-vet check' diagnosis.
Well re: Tim
I presumed that no medical conditions had been found to be the cause of the dog's behaviour.
Some of the contributory factors I gave were;
Mrs S at home mostly all day with the dog.
Recent surgery which took a long time to heal.
Extra attention provided by Mrs S as a result.
Conflict of ownership styles.
The dog's enhanced status re: spending time with the owners on their bed.
The dog had always been territorial.
The dog does not recognise Mr S's authority over him.
All the above had a 'tick' ok.
Also;
Aggression, Resource guarding and Defensive behaviours are all normal dog behaviours.
The dog has no 'learning history' with Mr Smith.
There is nothing sufficiently rewarding enough to the dog to carry out Mr S's commands.
Lack of recognition of Mr Smith as a higher status.
Reinforcement of dog's conflicting or unwanted behaviours by Mrs S.
Some of the influencing factors I supplied were;
Tim is likely to have received & learnt to enjoy additional attention from Mrs S during recovery from sugery.
The demands on him to get off the bed is a sudden removal of learnt privilages and may result in aggression.
Tim may now look upon Mrs S as a valuable resource.
Disobedience could be the result of the dog never having been taught what behaviour is acceptable/required.
Some Breed charactersitics I gave were;
Can be strong willed / Needs firm handling - especially teenage males (we used to have a Dally when I was young so I can concur with some of these issues) / Bred to guard 'horses' & carriage occupants originally / Hart & Hart's cluster research description was "Low reactivity - High Aggression - Low Trainability (Though I did point out that there are many contributory factors involved in a particular aspect of a dog's beahviour).
Misc;
No apparent medical reasons.
Tim may have become over-attached to Mrs S and her behaviours towards him may have increased his reliance on her.
The other dog accepts Tim's resource guarding of the bedroom, so no issue between the dogs.
Diet seems well balanced / premium dog food.
He seems to receive adequate exercise.
My Diagnosis;
Resource guarding / Protective aggression / Territorial aggression / lack of owner authority (Mr S) / Learnt behaviour.
I shall leave it to you to interpret as to what prognosis you would give and what Training/Behaviour modification plan you would present to the owners (and 'Owner Education'!).
Some protocols I used were;
Crate Training (teach the dog to settle in the crate)
Leadership.
Programme for Aggression.
Reward Based Training.
Sheila's comments included;
Physical exercise helps induce a tired mental state (I commented that it did not neccessarily do so - taking into account the physiology of Stress and increased adrenalin).
The DEFRA leaflet on barking tells the owner "to tell the dog to be quiet" without mentioning that it needs to be taught first!
If the owner looks at the dog when he is barking for attention, then they look away - they are providing mixed signals to the dog.
I did not personally pick up on teeth barring in Dallies & other breeds as a submissive behaviour and Sheila didn't mention it either. I know what you mean though. In a case I went to about a year ago, the dog was submissive in such way & acted silly mainly with the 'top person' in the family unit, not those the dog was actually aggressive towards. Personally I did not believe that Mr S was sufficiently important to Tim, for Tim to feel that he had to be submissive. But as you say, there is so little information that you have to make a lot of it up yourself!
Apart from that everything else I suggested/information provided seemed acceptable.
I hope that this helps with your thoughts, interpretations and diagnosis etc.
Just to confuse things, I was also told not to "take at face value what you have read and quoted, but critically examine everything you read, pointing out areas where you disagree and justifying your comments".
Regards
Carole